Non-linguistic Human Communication

Aridem Vintoni
"Nonlinguistic" means not using language. Nonlinguistic communication is the imparting of information without using language. Or in other words, sending and receiving messages without using a communication system that has the characteristic features of a language as identified by linguists. Gestures, written symbols, or voice sounds don't constitute "language" unless they take place within a language framework. For example, the voicing of sounds that are not part of any system is not called language, it is called babbling. Eventually babies start associating ideas and thoughts with sounds or signs (Owens, 1988). At that point you could say they are using "internal language." They aren't using "a language" yet, but they are using the building blocks of language to expedite their cognitive development. When a child starts saying a few words like mom or milk he is using language fragments to communicate. He is literally building a language framework. Suppose you were building a house. At what point could you actually call it a house? Would you call it a house when the frame is up? How about when the roof is on but not yet shingled? Suppose the roof has shingles and the walls have drywall but there are no doors or windows. Is it a house yet? As you can see there is no one exact defining moment when you could hammer in a certain nail and proclaim that "Whereas three seconds ago you were not a house and now with the hammering of this nail you are a house!"
Similarly you cannot look at a developing child and say you don't have language yet but let me teach you just one more syntactical construct and three more vocabulary words and boom you now have language.


(ASL Linguistics: Nonlinguistics Communication)

Body Language

What is body language, and is body language linguistic or nonlinguistic communication? Body language, as indicated by Mehrabian, is "nonverbal communication." Communication isn't the same thing as language. Many hearing people automatically consider body language to be nonlinguistic. Many people in the signing world tend to think of body language as being linguistic because they obviously using their bodies to produce language independent of their voices. There is a difference between sign language and body language. Just as there is a difference between using your body to produce ASL and using your body to produce mime. Both ASL and mime allow you to communicate. Of the two, only ASL qualifies as language. Mime is nonlinguistic. Two people of different languages can communicate using mime. Mime is defined as, "the art of portraying characters and acting out situations or a narrative by gestures and body movement without the use of words, (American Heritage, 2000). In contrast, ASL uses gestures and body movements to create signs. Signs are the visual equivalent of words. A sign can be broken down into phonemes, (cheremes actually). Those signs are combined according to grammar rules to describe the thoughts and ideas of the signer more efficiently than can be accomplished via mime.


Paralanguage is the nonphonemic properties of speech that people use to inflect the meanings or their verbal language. Speaking faster, using a lower tone of voice, raising the pitch of your voice at the end of a sentence are all examples of paralanguage. (American Heritage, 2000).

Nonverbal Communication

The term "verbal" has two common meanings: using words, and spoken. If I say that someone is using nonverbal communication, does that mean he is communicating without words? Or does that mean he is communicating without speaking. Popular usage tends to interpret the term "nonverbal communication as meaning communicating silently without words." American Sign Language is nonverbal in the sense that it is gesturally produced. But it is certainly "verbal" in the sense that it uses words, or rather signs. Words are the lexemes of spoken languages. Signs are the lexemes of signed languages.


A gesture is a body or limb movement that you use to express a thought or feeling (Websters, 2001). A cognitive scientist might say that a person using a gesture is employing language in that the gesture is a symbol that outwardly represents a thought or idea. A linguist would counter however that just because a symbol represents a thought or idea doesn't qualify it as language. Most adult Americans recognize dozens of gestures. For example, they recognize the shrugging of the shoulders as meaning "I don't know." Gestures are not the same as words or signs. Deaf people use signs as lexemes and use gestures to inflect the meanings of their signs. Gestures have meaning but are not organized into a language. Gestures are to language like spice is to food. One could argue that spice is a type of food and he would be right in that spices have calories and are consumable, but spice, in and of itself, is not considered to be food because it is used differently. People sit down and eat food. No body sits down, pours himself a bowl of pepper, and digs in.

Language is sort of like the freeze drying and packaging process. Why do people freeze dry food? Freeze drying makes it easier to preserve and transport food. Once the food arrives at its destination it can be reconstituted. What freeze drying and packaging does for food, language does for thoughts and ideas. Via language I can package my ideas into a few words and then transport them to your mind where you will (hopefully) reconstitute them. Just as a fresh banana is not freeze dried food--gestures and facial expressions are not language. Neither is mime.